Martin Burnicki: > Let's see the capture output first. Then we'll see whether we must have a > look at the driver.
Here's the result. 292:23:59:52 292:23:59:53 292:23:59:54 292:23:59:55 292:23:59:56 292:23:59:57 292:23:59:58 292:23:59:59 292:23:59:60 293:00:00:00 293:00:00:01 293:00:00:02 293:00:00:03 293:00:00:04 293:00:00:05 293:00:00:06 293:00:00:07 293:00:00:08 293:00:00:09 293:00:00:10 293:00:00:11 293:00:00:12 293:00:00:13 293:00:00:14 293:00:00:15 293:00:00:16 293:00:00:17 293:00:00:18 293:00:00:19 293:00:00:20 293:00:00:21 <---- 293:00:00:23 <---- 293:00:00:24 293:00:00:25 293:00:00:26 293:00:00:27 293:00:00:28 293:00:00:29 293:00:00:30 293:00:00:31 293:00:00:32 293:00:00:33 293:00:00:34 293:00:00:35 293:00:00:36 293:00:00:37 293:00:00:38 293:00:00:39 293:00:00:40 293:00:00:41 293:00:00:42 293:00:00:43 293:00:00:44 293:00:00:45 293:00:00:46 293:00:00:47 293:00:00:48 293:00:00:49 293:00:00:50 293:00:00:51 I only noticed a gap between second 21 and 23. Ralf _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
