>The reason I didn't suggest this is that I don't believe that there isn't
>any reasonable way in which a working crystal oscillator could be out
>by 500ppm, which implies that either the oscillator isn't being 
>disciplined by the crystal, or that something else is causing the
>frequency to be misinterpreted.  If the oscillator is free running, 
>trimming the error will leave you with a time source of very poor
>stability.

Buggy software is common.  Unfortunately.

-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to