Richard B. gilbert wrote: > Then perhaps the documentation needs to be updated! The 36 year "epoch" > (if that's the proper term) has been discussed before on this > newsgroup although not recently. Perhaps because it's rare for anyone > to start ntpd with a clock that's off by 37 years! I think you may be > the only person to report such a problem in the four years or so that > I've been reading this newsgroup!
Can we at least use the right numbers? It was 34 years and now is 68 years. Calculate 2^31 seconds from 1-1-1970. Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
