On 2008-11-25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I downloaded the source from http://www.ntp.org/downloads.html before > I saw your post on how to do it by building a deb package. I can redo > it that way if it will work better, though.
If all you are doing is using this ntpd for testing I would not worry too much. The key advantage to leveraging the package management system is that it will take care of satisfying all of the build-depends for you (with the 'apt-get build-dep ntp' command) and gives you a fully integrated package. [snip] > getnetnum given 127.127.7.0, got 127.127.7.0 (t_UNK/0) > newpeer: cast flags: 0x1 for address: 127.127.7.0 > newpeer: using fd 20 and our addr 127.0.0.1 > peer_crypto_clear: at 0 next 0 assoc ID 2307 > peer_clear: at 0 next 1 assoc ID 2307 refid INIT > audio_config_read: reading </etc/ntp.audio0> > idev </dev/oss/ich0/pcm0> > cdev </dev/oss/ich0/mix0> > agc <line> 8 > monitor <line> 6 > audio_init: </dev/oss/ich0/pcm0> bufsiz 240 > audio_show: ctl_fd 6 > newpeer: 127.0.0.1->127.127.7.0 mode 3 vers 4 poll 6 10 flags 0x1021 > 0x1 ttl 0 key 00000000 > getnetnum given 127.127.7.0, got 127.127.7.0 (t_REF/1) > authtrust: keyid 0000ffff life 1 > local_clock: time 0 offset 0.000000 freq 0.000 state 1 > report_event: system event 'event_restart' (0x01) status 'sync_alarm, > sync_unspec, 1 event, event_unspec' (0xc010) > refclock_transmit: at 1 127.127.7.0 > poll_update: at 1 127.127.7.0 flags 1021 poll 6 burst 0 last 1 next 65 > auth_agekeys: at 1 keys 1 expired 0 > timer: interface update > update_interfaces(123) > auth_agekeys: at 60 keys 1 expired 0 > refclock_transmit: at 65 127.127.7.0 > poll_update: at 65 127.127.7.0 flags 1021 poll 6 burst 0 last 65 next 128 It appears as though ntpd is properly recognizing and setting up the CHU ref-clock. It is possible that you are telling ntpd to monitor the correct sound line. > I'm guessing the > > auth_agekeys: at 720 keys 1 expired 0 > > lines means that ntp isn't hearing the audio signal, for whatever > reason. That line is entirely unrelated to your problem. > While I was writing this post, something else came up in the debug > output: [snip] > Is this significant? No. -- Steve Kostecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
