On Dec 22, 11:59 am, David Woolley <[email protected]> wrote: > dhavey wrote: > > are about a millisecond apart! That's no better than the server > > without the GPS. What did I do to deserve such lousy performance.? > > 1) Not used PPS. > > 2) Not used a valid GPS input on either machine. > > > > > GPS_NMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l - 16 0 0.000 > > 0.000 0.001 > > The GPS reference clock is unreachable and is, therefore, being > rejected. Same for the other machine. > > Without PPS, some GPS receivers are barely good for the second. > > > GPS_NMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l - 16 0 0.000 > > 0.000 0.001
./ppstest fails but there is output from the GPS: $GPRMC,211953,A,3426.0023,N,11950.9571,W, 000.0,332.6,221208,013.9,E,D*01 $GPGGA,211953,3426.0023,N,11950.9571,W,2,08,1.5,9.2,M,-32.5,M,,*74 $GPGSA,A,3,,05,10,12,18,21,24,29,30,,,,3.1,1.5,2.7*32 $GPGSV,3,1,11,02,13,062,00,05,33,186,51,10,44,054,37,12,26,173,52*70 $GPGSV,3,2,11,18,16,204,47,21,37,267,46,24,69,334,49,29,68,351,48*7B $GPGSV,3,3,11,30,52,212,51,31,05,278,00,48,48,203,46*41 $PGRME,2.6,M,5.0,M,5.7,M*2D $PGRMB,,,,,,K,,,*2D I guess I have to muck around with the GPS settings some more. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
