On Dec 23, 12:42 pm, David Woolley <[email protected]> wrote: > dhavey wrote: > > The performance is still really bad: > > You still don't have PPS. > > One of your other servers is in severe distress (stepping). Three of > the servers for the first machine, including GPS and the other statum 1 > have been declared false tickers. > > Do you really expect better than Windows performance? > > > remote refid st t when poll reach delay > > offset jitter > > ============================================================================== > > x192.168.0.2 69.25.96.13 2 u 1 16 377 0.130 > > 4.307 0.417 > > 192.168.0.26 192.168.0.2 2 u 47 16 210 0.000 0.000 > > 130.357 > > 192.168.0.27 .STEP. 16 u - 16 0 0.000 > > 0.000 0.000 > > x192.168.0.29 .GPS. 1 u 11 16 376 0.086 > > -199.29 0.172 > > xGPS_NMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l 4 16 377 0.000 > > -220.73 2.039 > > > remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset > > jitter > > ============================================================================== > > 192.168.0.26 192.168.0.2 2 u 13 16 42 0.007 > > 15.204 0.409 > > 192.168.0.27 192.168.0.29 2 u 1214 16 0 0.001 > > 40.722 0.000 > > 192.168.0.28 71.80.83.0 3 u 2 16 377 0.018 > > 199.327 0.123 > > *GPS_NMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l 3 16 377 0.000 > > 0.605 3.320
I was hoping for sub-millisecond precision. You were right. The PPS wasn't asserting itself. (it should learn to be more assertive ;) I'm sure I started it befor I left town. I have it started now but the offset is bouncing around badly (-3 to around 2 milliseconds) Ugh! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
