Antonio M. Moreiras wrote: > Hi, Danny. > > I can understand your point of view. Nevertheless, I don't have an > usenet account and the process to send messages via > "[email protected]" is moderated and is a bit slow and > unpredictable. Sometimes it takes hours, sometimes it takes days to get > the message to the group. > > I needed to be sure the message would arrive soon. Google gmail is very > reliable and gives free access to the usenet. Actually, I do not see it > as unacceptable, as it would be possible to verify the authenticity of > the message by other means (consulting the IPs, for example, or asking). > But, sure, I would feel much more comfortable if sending the message > from nic.br. Anyway, thank you for your message and feedback. I will do > everything possible to find a better solution for usenet access. > > If any doubt remained about the authenticity of the message, it was > authentic. The survey was actually conducted by NIC.br. The current > stage of data collection ended on 26/12. There was a preliminary > gathering between 02 and 04 December, and the main collection was taken > between 12 and 26 December. We had about 240 thousand responses in > "ntpdate" and 170 thousand in "ntpq -c rl" and "ntpq -p". We actually > visited 1,141,065 possible ntp servers of a total of 2,516,029 IPs found > (on monlist). > > I'd like to take this opportunity to thank the collaboration of all. We > are analyzing the data and will soon publish some results.
Please let us know when the results are available. Many of us will be interested! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
