The linux kernel bug aparently was found and fixed: related thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/2/276
bug analysis: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/2/373 fix: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/2/415 Antonio M. Moreiras. Bill Unruh escreveu: > On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Danny Mayer wrote: > >> Unruh wrote: >>> George R. Kasica <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:31:34 +0100, Rob van der Putten <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi there >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Steve Kostecke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> All my Linux systems had a fine time. None of them locked up / crashed / >>>>>> rebooted / etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> The kernels involved included: >>>>>> >>>>>> 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 >>>>>> 2.6.18-5-486 >>>>>> 2.6.16-2-486 >>>>>> 2.6.18-5-k7 >>>>>> 2.6.18-4-powerpc >>>>>> 2.4.16-k7 >>>>> What about the hardware (Intel /AMD)? >>>> Rob: >>>> Everything in my post above was Intel based, no AMD or otherwise. >>> Why in the world would you then have an amd64 kerenl and two k7 kernels, >>> and one powerpc kernel? None of those is intel. >>> >> He *never* said that. Those are Steve's systems. The post even includes >> that fact. > > Ooops. My mistake-- not reading th > properly > > >> Danny >> > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
