>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Danny Mayer) >>> writes:
DaveHart> As I've stated repeatedly, it's better than what we have now. DaveHart> Now interpolation is used unconditionally. With my change, it is DaveHart> avoided if the scenario that breaks it is detected (fine-grained DaveHart> system clock). On Vista and later, with -M, it always detects DaveHart> that breakage and disables interpolation. There is no DaveHart> regression, only forward progress. Danny> Sorry, you misunderstand what I meant. What you do personally is up Danny> to you. However, what goes into the ntp project I do have a say. I Danny> appreciate your efforts and would be happy to incorporate your Danny> suggested changes into ntp, but it needs to follow the guidelines. And Dave Hart has a say, and I have a say, as do several other folks. I vote we try some things and see what happens and have some productive dialogues. -- Harlan Stenn <[email protected]> http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
