Rob wrote: > [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >> The refclock driver is doing a good job of checking the validity of >> each DCF77 'telegram'. >> If a telegram is invalid, NTP freewheels until reception improves. > > But that surely has not been the case in all versions. Bad things have > happened if trash was received. > > So it all depends on the actual version of ntpd in use.
I expect that you do not really know any more details, right? I am doing my tests with ntpd 4.2.2p4. Do I expect to much from you when I ask if this is a "bad" version when using the parse refclock in mode 5 for a simple dcf77 receiver? Matthias _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
