Matthias Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob wrote: > >> [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The refclock driver is doing a good job of checking the validity of >>> each DCF77 'telegram'. >>> If a telegram is invalid, NTP freewheels until reception improves. >> >> But that surely has not been the case in all versions. Bad things have >> happened if trash was received. >> >> So it all depends on the actual version of ntpd in use. > > I expect that you do not really know any more details, right? > > I am doing my tests with ntpd 4.2.2p4. Do I expect to much from you > when I ask if this is a "bad" version when using the parse refclock in > mode 5 for a simple dcf77 receiver?
No I don't have a table of ntp versions and their performance... I would advise to first update the ntpd and then check again. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
