Harlan Stenn wrote: > Richard, > > Please be more tolerant. > > Some of us *vastly* prefer top-posted articles. > > Let's just agree to disagree about this, and stop lobbying for our personal > preferences. > > H > -- >>>> In article <[email protected]>, "Richard B. >>>> Gilbert" <[email protected]> writes: > > Richard> Towli wrote: >>> Wau - Thank you ! i bellieve thats exactly what i needed. It works on my >>> personal pc but not on my domain pc. I bellieve port 123 is blocked in >>> the firewall at work. Can i somehow verify if there is open for port udp >>> port 123 and if it is not open, is there an alternative way to do what is >>> done with that command? Best rgds /T "Rob" <[email protected]> skrev i >>> meddelelsen news:[email protected]... >>>> Towli <[email protected]> wrote: Hi >>>> I would like to test my internal clock (from my domain pc) against a >>>> public >>>> ntp server, to see if there is a discrepance (i suspect our domain time >>>> is >>>> not synchronised properly). >>>> Is there a way to do this? >>>> w32tm /monitor /computers:pool.ntp.org >>>> > > Richard> Please don't top post! > > Richard> Ask your network manager about port 123/UDP. He should be able to > Richard> tell you if he has it blocked and, perhaps, will be willing to open > Richard> it if you tell him you need it. >
It seems that the "vast majority" disagree. I'm not about to jump on your patron for top posting; I think he's earned the right to do what he wants. For everyone else. . . . a. Bottom posting is the custom! b. It makes a lot of sense to have a discussion in order, from top to bottom. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
