"Richard B. Gilbert" <[email protected]> writes: >Harlan Stenn wrote: >> Richard, >> >> Please be more tolerant. >> >> Some of us *vastly* prefer top-posted articles. >> >> Let's just agree to disagree about this, and stop lobbying for our personal >> preferences. >> >> H >> -- >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, "Richard B. >>>>> Gilbert" <[email protected]> writes: >> >> Richard> Towli wrote: >>>> Wau - Thank you ! i bellieve thats exactly what i needed. It works on my >>>> personal pc but not on my domain pc. I bellieve port 123 is blocked in >>>> the firewall at work. Can i somehow verify if there is open for port udp >>>> port 123 and if it is not open, is there an alternative way to do what is >>>> done with that command? Best rgds /T "Rob" <[email protected]> skrev i >>>> meddelelsen news:[email protected]... >>>>> Towli <[email protected]> wrote: Hi >>>>> I would like to test my internal clock (from my domain pc) against a >>>>> public >>>>> ntp server, to see if there is a discrepance (i suspect our domain time >>>>> is >>>>> not synchronised properly). >>>>> Is there a way to do this? >>>>> w32tm /monitor /computers:pool.ntp.org >>>>> >> >> Richard> Please don't top post! >> >> Richard> Ask your network manager about port 123/UDP. He should be able to >> Richard> tell you if he has it blocked and, perhaps, will be willing to open >> Richard> it if you tell him you need it. >>
>It seems that the "vast majority" disagree. I'm not about to jump on >your patron for top posting; I think he's earned the right to do what he >wants. For everyone else. . . . >a. Bottom posting is the custom! >b. It makes a lot of sense to have a discussion in order, from top to >bottom. And it makes even more sense to have it at the top so that I can see that the response is totally off topic without having to scroll through the whole rest of the ancient history of the post. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
