"David Woolley" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
David J Taylor wrote:

I remember the flying of caesium or other atomic clocks round the world, and that folks had to invoke relativistic corrections. Were these better than microseconds as well?

That's called Navstar (GPS) and GPS position solutions do have to include a general relativity correction to the satellite clocks.

Not today's GPS, but some forty or more years ago:

 http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/abouthp/histnfacts/timeline/hist_60s.html

1964:

"The highly accurate HP 5060A cesium-beam atomic clocks gain worldwide recognition as the "flying clocks" when they are flown from Palo Alto to Switzerland to compare time as maintained by the U.S. Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C. to time at the Swiss Observatory in Neuchatel. The atomic clock was designed to maintain accuracy for 3000 years with only one second of error. The cesium-beam standard becomes the standard for international time."

I had wondered what accuracy was obtained - i.e. how far was each nation out - and whether relativistic corrections had been needed for these "flying clock" tests.

Cheers,
David
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to