John Hasler <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob writes: >> I don't feel free to design those because I can anticipate that the >> changes will be rejected and will not go into the distribution >> version. > > Then use and contribute to Chrony. We welcome contributions. Why > continue to criticize Ntpd if you feel that your suggestions will be > ignored?
I think ntpd has a good number of features and advantages, and I only wonder why nobody has yet decided to take the code and fork a version that has some of the properties of chrony, and fixes some of the obvious problems when being used in a different environment than the maintainer envisioned. (like embedded systems, where there is a need to set the initial time without operator intervention) _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
