Thank you all.  Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Steve Kostecke
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 7:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] systems won't synchronize no matter what

On 2010-10-28, Parvin, Richard <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've noticed that a lot of people use iburst on thier server lines.
> I'm wondering why.

iburst == initial burst

iburst causes ntpd to use a volley of 8 polls at 2 second intervals when
a time server becomes reachable (e.g. at start up). 

ntpd needs to poll a remote time server a minimum of 4 times to collect
enough data to choose it as the sys_peer (i.e. sync to it). The first
poll occurs after ntpd initializes and resolves the server hostname.

For this discussion we will assume the first poll takes place 5 seconds
after ntpd is started.

The default minimum poll interval (minpoll) is 64 seconds. Without
iburst ntpd needs at least 5+(3*64) or 197 seconds (3m17s) for initial
sync.

With iburst ntpd needs at least 5+(3*2) or 11 seconds for initial sync.

-- 
Steve Kostecke <[email protected]>
NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
  • Re: [ntp:quest... Steve Kostecke
    • Re: [ntp:... Florin Andrei
      • Re: [... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
        • R... Steve Kostecke
        • R... Florin Andrei
      • Re: [... unruh
        • R... Parvin, Richard
          • ... Dave Hart
          • ... Terje Mathisen
          • ... Steve Kostecke
          • ... Parvin, Richard
          • ... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
          • ... Dave Hart
        • R... Florin Andrei
          • ... unruh
          • ... Steve Kostecke
        • R... Florin Andrei
          • ... David J Taylor
          • ... David Lord
          • ... David J Taylor
          • ... Richard B. Gilbert

Reply via email to