On 2010-10-28, unruh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010-10-28, Florin Andrei <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here's the default ntp.conf that comes with CentOS 5, I assume all Red >> Hat derivatives are very similar or identical:
[snip] >> # Permit time synchronization with our time source, but do not >> # permit the source to query or modify the service on this system. >> restrict default kod nomodify notrap nopeer noquery >> restrict -6 default kod nomodify notrap nopeer noquery >> >> # Permit all access over the loopback interface. This could >> # be tightened as well, but to do so would effect some of >> # the administrative functions. >> restrict 127.0.0.1 >> restrict -6 ::1 > > ?? Again, I would get rid of all of the restrict lines. None of those restrict lines affect time service. >> # Undisciplined Local Clock. This is a fake driver intended for backup >> # and when no outside source of synchronized time is available. >> server 127.127.1.0 # local clock >> fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10 > > Complete lunacy. > It is NOT backup. It is not something that is useful for anything except > to fool other machines into thinking you are synchronized when you are > not. Why not file a bug report in the offending OS' BTS? I doubt they follow this news-group. > [---=| TOFU protection by t-prot: 21 lines snipped |=---] http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html -- Steve Kostecke <[email protected]> NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
