Somebody wrote: > On 12/17/2011 12:20 PM, Steve Kostecke wrote: > > You should not be using the Undisciplined Local Clock > > (127.127.1.x, aka "LOCAL") unless this ntpd must be > > able to serve time to others when no real time sources > > are available. > > Is there a reason to not use orphan instead in that case?
I'm thinking that for 4.2.8 (and 4.2.7-RSN) it might make sense to disable the local refclock by default, as most folks *should* be using orphan mode instead, and with all of the problems caused by the inappropriate use of the local refclock this change will give folks an opportunity to fix their configs (or just enable the driver and reinstall, or just ignore the warning at ntp startup). H _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
