A C wrote:
Is this what you would expect from ntpq -c clockvar from a system that
is synced on PPS:
ntpq> clockvar
associd=0 status=0000 no events, clk_unspec,
device="PPS Clock Discipline", timecode=, poll=11425, noreply=0,
badformat=0, baddata=0, stratum=16, refid=80.80.83.0, flags=14
rv shows:
ntpq> rv
associd=0 status=011d leap_none, sync_pps, 1 event, kern,
version="ntpd [email protected] Thu Feb 9 01:02:23 UTC 2012 (1)",
processor="sparc", system="NetBSD/5.1", leap=00, stratum=1,
precision=-13, rootdelay=0.000, rootdisp=1.150, refid=PPS,
reftime=d2ec8c38.8b4e0f18 Mon, Feb 20 2012 9:09:12.544,
clock=d2ec8c42.e3f01a01 Mon, Feb 20 2012 9:09:22.890, peer=56093, tc=4,
mintc=3, offset=-0.007, frequency=-78.483, sys_jitter=0.122,
clk_jitter=0.014, clk_wander=0.001, tai=34, leapsec=201207010000,
expire=201212280000
I guess I'm confused because the stratum and the refid don't match.
This is from my system with Sure GPS.
Seems to be similar to yours. I don't have a clue as to stratum and
refid as this is first time I've used ntpq clockvar.
associd=0 status=00f1 , 15 events, clk_no_reply,
device="PPS Clock Discipline", timecode=, poll=96503, noreply=300,
badformat=o, baddata=0, fudgetime1=0.000, stratum=16,refid=80.80.83.98,
flags=4
associd=0 status=0119 leap_none, sync_pps, 1 event, leap_armed,
version="ntpd [email protected] Tue Dec 27 09:47:55 UTC 2011 (1)",
processor="i386", system="NetBSD/5.1_STABLE", leap=00, stratum=1,
precision=-18, rootdelay=0.000, rootdisp=0.315, refid=PPSb,
reftime=d2ecad51.c7c9dc25 Mon, Feb 20 2012 11:30:25.780,
clock=d2ecad57.2e21ead2 Mon, Feb 20 2012 11:30:31.180, peer=65276, tc=4,
mintc=3, offset=0.000, frequency=-35.663, sys_jitter=0.004,
clk_jitter=0.003, clk_wander=0.006, tai=34, leapsec=201207010000,
expire=201212280000
David
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
