As indicated in that bug report, the peer variables for the association, such as from ntpq -c "rv &1", should show stratum=0 as expected for a refclock.
Cheers, Dave Hart On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:56, Michael Tatarinov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > I've been interested in this :) > http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1682 > > 2012/2/20 A C <[email protected]> > >> Is this what you would expect from ntpq -c clockvar from a system that is >> synced on PPS: >> >> ntpq> clockvar >> associd=0 status=0000 no events, clk_unspec, >> device="PPS Clock Discipline", timecode=, poll=11425, noreply=0, >> badformat=0, baddata=0, stratum=16, refid=80.80.83.0, flags=14 >> >> rv shows: >> >> ntpq> rv >> associd=0 status=011d leap_none, sync_pps, 1 event, kern, >> version="ntpd [email protected] Thu Feb 9 01:02:23 UTC 2012 (1)", >> processor="sparc", system="NetBSD/5.1", leap=00, stratum=1, >> precision=-13, rootdelay=0.000, rootdisp=1.150, refid=PPS, >> reftime=d2ec8c38.8b4e0f18 Mon, Feb 20 2012 9:09:12.544, >> clock=d2ec8c42.e3f01a01 Mon, Feb 20 2012 9:09:22.890, peer=56093, tc=4, >> mintc=3, offset=-0.007, frequency=-78.483, sys_jitter=0.122, >> clk_jitter=0.014, clk_wander=0.001, tai=34, leapsec=201207010000, >> expire=201212280000 >> >> I guess I'm confused because the stratum and the refid don't match. >> _______________________________________________ >> questions mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions >> > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
