On 2014-01-13, David Woolley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13/01/14 10:22, [email protected] wrote: > >> againstthe reference implementation, but how do you prove that > > the reference implementation is correct? > > I thought the reference implementation was correct by definition.
Since the reference implementation could have bugs, that would be impossible if it were correct by definition. What happens if the reference implimentation deviated from the design specification? Mind you, the RFC could also have bugs (corner cases for which the RFC fails). They are both evolving. > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
