On 13/01/2014 14:34, David Woolley wrote:
On 13/01/14 10:22, [email protected] wrote:
againstthe reference implementation, but how do you prove that
> the reference implementation is correct?
I thought the reference implementation was correct by definition.
Ideally, you need a version built purely to the paper specification by a
"clean-room" team, and then see where the differences lie under testing.
I can't see that happening with the effort currently available, to be
honest.
--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
