On 14/01/2014 14:58, Sanal, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I understand that whenever the server sets the Leap Indicator flag to 11 
>> [not synchronized] the default behavior of ntp client is to reject the 
>> server time stamp.
>> Is there any configuration option for ntpd by which I can make the ntp 
>> client to trust the server even in this case?
>>
>> --
>> Arjun

> Arjun,
> 
> I expect you already know this, but you could add more servers, so that 
> rejecting the bad server does not affect timekeeping.  Be sure you are 
> running version 4.2.7, and be sure to use the pool directive.
> 
> Is trusting an obviously wrong server really a good idea?
> -- 
> Cheers,
> David
> Web: http://www.satsignal.eu

Hi David,
Thanks for the reply. I agree that under normal circumstances trusting a wrong 
server is not good. I will explain my use case a bit.
The setup is a blade server, which has one master blade server which runs the 
ntp server. All other blades sync the time from this master. The master itself 
gets it time from a higher ntp server. The problem is when the master says that 
it is not suitable for synchronization, the client blades shouldn't reject it. 
If they, do all the blades will end up with different time.
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
  • [ntp:questions... Sanal, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
    • Re: [ntp:... David Taylor
      • Re: [... Sanal, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
        • R... mike cook
        • R... Maarten Wiltink
          • ... Martin Burnicki
          • ... William Unruh
            • ... Sanal, Arjun (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
            • ... Martin Burnicki
              • ... Harlan Stenn
                • ... Maarten Wiltink
        • R... David Woolley
        • R... E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists

Reply via email to