Le 28 janv. 2014 à 10:02, Rob a écrit : > Brian Utterback <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't know about lost packets. It seems to me that dropping the packet >> that triggered an ARP request is not very robust, in fact it is down >> right fragile. Are you sure that there really are such implementations? > > Typically all cisco implementations behave this way. > However, there is no cisco involved in this case. > It is all Linux. It looks like Linux does not do this.
Last line sounds like a contradiction? I tried to reproduce the issue with FreeBSD 8.2 client and Linux 3.2.27 server on links with dumb switches and could not. Even when the arp cache entry for that client was long gone (verfied) the server acted correctly on the next poll. What OSs are your client and server? > > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
