On 28/01/2014 08:57, Rob wrote:
Brian Utterback <[email protected]> wrote:
Anyway, nothing every came of the discussion.
I commented on that generic situation a while ago.
It seems typical for discussions about ntpd functionality.
Suggestions are always ridiculed, the specs are perfect now,
the code is without bugs.
Although it wouldn't help me, I can see the sense in having an option:
"2burst" or "wakeup"
or something like that for accessing remote servers.
--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
