On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:36 PM, William Unruh <un...@invalid.ca> wrote:
> Why shoul dit ship with no refclocks? ... DO you have the same opinion for > serial > port or parallel ports, or network drivers? (Ignoring your mischaracterization of what I said and the strawman arguments) because a negligible number of time consumers have a refclock. Back in the day I recall a distro that had ntp-client and ntp-server packages -- so I'm sure I'm not the first person to propose it. Kernel pps is used by enough people that it should be compiled in by > default. I think you engage in a great deal of idle speculation. We have thousands of clients served from three S2 servers (so 0% need for refclock support). There are three S1 servers on campus (not yet in production). All three required building NTPd, one required a driver patch and one required building a kernel. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
