You, like anyone else who has issues with the draft, have been invited to file those issues on GitHub or by sending a review e-mail. Bearing in mind that we’re now past the end of Last Call, I can assure you that we as editors will attempt to address all usable feedback on the style and content of the documents.
From: QUIC <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 12:55 PM To: Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> Cc: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>; Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>; QUIC WG <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-32 On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:52 AM Lucas Pardue <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Hi, On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:36 PM Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Hi My Friend Lucas, I expected that you would copy Stewart's review if you really wish to discuss this issue in detail seriously.. As per-Magnus Last Call instructions, discussion of all Last Call issues should take place via issues on the GitHub repository. I don't have it on hand but I kept it somewhere, maybe I had resent it to quic list? Stewart gives good comments on the style and directs how they could be corrected. These have been addressed in the issues tracked under the milestone https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/4 Good to hear. Now this has to be repeated for all drafts :) Behcet Cheers, Lucas
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
