Hi Lucas, I think your offer is a good step forward. Thanks.
But I am unable to understand why you want to restrict the intended status to Experimental? BTW I checked all 3 multipath drafts and all of them ask for standards track status. What is wrong with multipath that warrants downgrading its status? Behcet On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:30 PM Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Spencer, > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 6:00 PM Spencer Dawkins at IETF < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Lucas, >> >> I agree - sorry if I was unclear. My suspicion, to be confirmed or >> overturned, is that "several multipath use cases" may not mean "all of the >> proposed multipath use cases". >> >> Using my two categories above, I'll be looking especially closely to see >> if a single multipath QUIC design can address use cases in both categories. >> > > Thanks for the clarification. As an individual, I think you and I are in > general agreement, turning "unknown unknowns" into "known tradeoffs and > demarkations " seems a nice next step to keep the conversation moving. > > Cheers > Lucas >
