Hey, See responses inline:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 3:50 PM Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jana, > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:44 PM Jana Iyengar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Behcet, >> >> Lucas isn't talking about the status of the drafts, he's suggesting that >> folks experiment with the proposals before we discuss their adoption. I >> support this. >> > > That's not how I understood Lucas mail. But I take you word for it even > though not from the chairs :) > The original chair's statement from Lars said "The QUIC WG remains the default venue for continued open discussion of multipath experiments and results.". The subset of the QUIC WG that are interested in multipath QUIC are free to experiment with one or more of the I-Ds that are floating around. Lars also states that adoption of _any_ multipath document is contingent on the three listed criteria. > Let me also say that there is good support for mpquic, Apple, Alibaba, > Tencent, all those support it, implement it and use it. > >From the interim meeting, I did not take away the impression that multipath QUIC had been implemented and used by all of these parties. We heard from Alibaba folks and, as per Lars' instructions, are open to hearing the results from others if there is any. Cheers Lucas
