True, Christian; it should be the IAB, not the IESG. Thanks. Gonzalo
From: Christian Huitema <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 10:19 To: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]>; Marten Seemann <[email protected]>; Liaison Statement Management Tool <[email protected]> Cc: Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Lucas Pardue <[email protected]>; Lars Eggert <[email protected]>; QUIC Discussion List <[email protected]>; Martin Duke <[email protected]>; IAB Chair <[email protected]> Subject: Re: New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions" The policy on liaisons is indeed for the IAB to decide, not individual working groups let alone individual members of working groups. I read Marten's request as a polite suggestion, not an attempt to set policy. On the other hand, I think it would be a really good idea for the IAB to take that suggestion and make it part of our liaison policy, stating that the IETF would prefer to receive liaison statements in either text or PDF format... -- Christian Huitema On 11/30/2020 11:37 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: Hi Marten, our friends from 3GPP can probably convert that into a PDF trivially. In any case, for future liaisons, is this a new official policy approved by the IESG to handle incoming liaisons? If so, it would be useful to inform all our liaison managers to make our expectations on other organizations clear and avoid this type of back-and-forth exchanges. Cheers, Gonzalo From: Marten Seemann <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 06:17 To: Liaison Statement Management Tool <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Lucas Pardue <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; Lars Eggert <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; QUIC Discussion List <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>; Martin Duke <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions" Would it be possible to publish this document in a format that can be opened by everyone without using proprietary software? Thank you, Marten On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:40 PM Liaison Statement Management Tool <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Title: LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions Submission Date: 2020-11-30 URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1710/ From: Susanna Kooistra <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: Lars Eggert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,Lucas Pardue <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: QUIC Discussion List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,Martin Duke <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,Lucas Pardue <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,Lars Eggert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>,[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Response Contacts: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>,[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Technical Contacts: Purpose: For information Body: Attachments: S2-2009400_8852r02 https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2020-11-30-3gpp-tsgsa-sa2-quic-ls-on-atsss-phase-2-conclusions-attachment-1.doc
