Hello Lars and others

How about the following addition below? I know it leaves widely open what kind 
of experimentations would be helpful. I

Bets regards
Hannu

-------

Thank you for the update on your architectural design and your intended 
standardization timeline.

Multipath support for QUIC remains under active discussion in the IETF QUIC 
working group. While multiple design proposals for such an extension have been 
proposed, it remains uncertain for the time being if the WG will come to 
consensus on adopting a work item on multipath QUIC, and if so, which 
individual proposal it would be based on and whether or not it would satisfy 
your architectural design. To help with the selection process we are calling 
for experimentation results to better understand the design scape options. We 
unfortunately also cannot predict whether the WG discussion will have 
sufficiently progressed by March 2021 for such a consensus to emerge.



From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 8:25 PM
To: Lars Eggert <[email protected]>
Cc: Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <[email protected]>; QUIC 
WG <[email protected]>; Waqar Zia <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Draft response to New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 
conclusions"

Hi, Lars,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:33 AM Lars Eggert 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,

On 2020-12-11, at 11:29, Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
> Shouldn't the response say something about the expectation of 
> experimentations?

could you make a text suggestion? It's not fully clear to me what you think we 
should say.

I'm not Hannu, so Hannu should answer this, but if you do end up with text 
about experimentation in the proposed liaison back, you might point out that 
the QUIC working group would appreciate hearing results of experimentation from 
people who participate in 3GPP.

We often remind other SDOs that the best way to work IETF is to participate in 
IETF working groups (and that's exactly what 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3113/?include_text=1 says explicitly to 
3GPP), but saying "and please tell us your experimental results" is different 
enough from other ways that other SDOs have worked with the IETF, that it might 
be worth saying explicitly.

Do The Right Thing, of course.

Best,

Spencer

Thanks,
Lars

Reply via email to