FWIW, On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 4:55 AM Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Lars and others > > > > How about the following addition below? I know it leaves widely open what > kind of experimentations would be helpful. I > > > > Bets regards > > Hannu > > > > ------- > > > > Thank you for the update on your architectural design and your intended > standardization timeline. > > > > Multipath support for QUIC remains under active discussion in the IETF > QUIC working group. While multiple design proposals for such an extension > have been proposed, it remains uncertain for the time being if the WG will > come to consensus on adopting a work item on multipath QUIC, and if so, > which individual proposal it would be based on and whether or not it would > satisfy your architectural design. *To help with the selection process we > are calling for experimentation results to better understand the design > scape options. *We unfortunately also cannot predict whether the WG > discussion will have sufficiently progressed by March 2021 for such a > consensus to emerge. > I think that's fine. Thanks for proposing this text. Best, Spencer > *From:* Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2020 8:25 PM > *To:* Lars Eggert <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <[email protected]>; > QUIC WG <[email protected]>; Waqar Zia <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: Draft response to New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS > Phase 2 conclusions" > > > > Hi, Lars, > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:33 AM Lars Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2020-12-11, at 11:29, Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Shouldn't the response say something about the expectation of > experimentations? > > could you make a text suggestion? It's not fully clear to me what you > think we should say. > > > > I'm not Hannu, so Hannu should answer this, but if you do end up with text > about experimentation in the proposed liaison back, you might point out > that the QUIC working group would appreciate hearing results of > experimentation from people who participate in 3GPP. > > > > We often remind other SDOs that the best way to work IETF is to > participate in IETF working groups (and that's exactly what > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3113/?include_text=1 says explicitly > to 3GPP), but saying "and please tell us your experimental results" is > different enough from other ways that other SDOs have worked with the IETF, > that it might be worth saying explicitly. > > > > Do The Right Thing, of course. > > > > Best, > > > > Spencer > > > Thanks, > Lars > >
