Hi Roman, thanks for your review! I apparently merged these nits directly into master without creating a PR but I guess that's not a problem. They are address in any case.
Regarding your other comment, I opened an issue, however, I think this recommendation was explicitly discussed and agreed in the wg and therefore I would not what to change it without further input from the group. But note that the wording says "avoided" and not "forbitten" or anything, so I don't think there is a hige diference. Actually I think the more important sentence is the last one in this section: "however, fallback must not silently violate the application's expectation of confidentiality or integrity of its payload data." Mirja On 21.04.22, 03:07, "Roman Danyliw via Datatracker" <[email protected]> wrote: Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-quic-applicability-16: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-applicability/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Chris Lonvick for the SECDIR review. Section 2. Specifically, fallback to insecure protocols or to weaker versions of secure protocols needs to be avoided. Consider if fallback needs to be the default behavior of applications. For example: Specifically, support for fallback to insecure protocols or to weaker versions of the secure protocol needs to be evaluated on a per-application basis. Section 2. Typo. s/a application/an application/ Section 3.2. Typo. s/mobilty/mobility/ Section 14. Typo. s/negotation/negotiation/
