Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-quic-applicability-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-applicability/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Chris Lonvick for the SECDIR review. Section 2. Specifically, fallback to insecure protocols or to weaker versions of secure protocols needs to be avoided. Consider if fallback needs to be the default behavior of applications. For example: Specifically, support for fallback to insecure protocols or to weaker versions of the secure protocol needs to be evaluated on a per-application basis. Section 2. Typo. s/a application/an application/ Section 3.2. Typo. s/mobilty/mobility/ Section 14. Typo. s/negotation/negotiation/
