Martin,

Thx for setting up the remote access, and thanks for including AQM.

I'm sure you know that the body of the text is still really all about CCAs and AQM looks like an afterthought at the moment. Would it be useful to be given some suggested text about why AQM is included, and what might be done on AQM. Or would you rather write that yourself?

In my mind, it would be quite simple. Sthg like:

   Over the last few years, several developments have raised questions
   about the
   value of this model:

   * The community working on congestion control *and AQM*, both
   industry and academia, now has a much better understanding ...
   ...
     * As the only Standards-Track general-purpose congestion control
   is Reno, other standards reference it, although it is a minority of
   Internet traffic today.

   ** Some AQM algorithms that were originally published on the
   experimental track are becoming widely deployed. However, the
   original specifications do not always include more recent
   improvements and operational aspects.*

   ...

   A separate working group can review some of the impediments to early
   congestion control work occurring in the IETF, and generalize
   transport in this area from TCP to all the relevant transport
   protocols. *The congestion control expertise in the working group
   would also make it a natural venue to take on any work on AQM
   algorithms. *Accordingly, CONGRESS is chartered
   to do the following work:
   ...

I can put the above in a PR if you want.


Bob

On 07/11/2022 18:54, Martin Duke wrote:
As I've mentioned in a few venues, the congestion control working group (renamed CONGRESS) has had some fine-tuning to the charter:

https://github.com/martinduke/congestion-control-charter

I am currently the proponent and Zahed is the responsible AD. We are holding a side meeting at 1700 on Thursday in Richmond 6. Depending on the attendees, possible subjects include:

- comments on the charter
- discussions about next steps
- solicitation of draft authors for key deliverables.

See you there!
Martin


--
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoehttp://bobbriscoe.net/

Reply via email to