Hi Nilo, On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 6:11 PM Nilo Massimo <massimo.nilo= [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > first of all thanks for the many comments received. > > As jointly agreed at the time with the chairs of the IPPM, QUIC and TSWG > WGs, this draft is general and its purpose is to describe only the > measurement methodologies in a protocol independent way. In order to > describe their application to a certain protocol, it was agreed to present > a specific draft in the related WG. > > So to give an example, with regard to the COAP protocol, this was done by > submitting a draft in the CORE WG. See > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap-pm/ > > Therefore, with regard to the QUIC protocol, we will prepare a draft to be > presented in the QUIC WG which will address the issues highlighted in this > thread and details related to the possible future implementation. > > > > As for this draft > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-explicit-flow-measurements > , we will write a new version of it where the section 6 will be placed in a > draft appendix and renamed to Experimental Examples. > > In this way (we hope) it will be clear that we are talking about > experiments made, and that they must not be interpreted as implementation. > > > > If the other co-authors agree, we can proceed to make a new version of the > draft. > Given that section 6 just seems to be a trivial presentation of how to assign bits in QUIC's 7 bit space, I don't really see what the value of talking about any specifics are. What benefit would the authors see in keeping an appendix? Cheers Lucas
