Re: ack_delay_exponent, and acks received before transport parameters

[Martin Thomson]

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023, at 23:20, Marten Seemann wrote:
> quic-go therefore neither sends nor acts upon ACK delays reported in 
> Initial packets. I thought we had text about that in the RFC, but I 
> can't find it. 

Same (modulo the below).  Should we open an issue to track that?

I think that our approach is different.  We accept delays, but they will be 
bounded in their impact (minimum RTT bounds it on one end, and zero bounds it 
on the other) and we simply accept that.