> Am 29.09.2025 um 11:14 schrieb Ross Finlayson <[email protected]>:
>
>> 2. Website owners are reluctant to enable HTTP/3.
>
> Or website owners *cannot* enable HTTP/3. Remember that the Apache web
> server - which according to some statistics implements more than 25% of all
> websites - still does not support HTTP/3 (QUIC).
No one has come forward to do or fund that development. Simple as that.
Also, I doubt that it would have any influence on the cloudflare use numbers. =)
And, in addition, if one really wants that, there are several implementations
that can do HTTP/3 is a reverse proxy in front of any server.
I would guess that many small web site owners simply do not care. And many
large site owners use a CDN, where all CDNs talk HTTP/1.1 to the origin host
exclusively because they have no HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 implementation in the
backend. I wonder why they think this is not worth it?
So, I find that Apache argument not convincing.
- Stefan
