[ I cant stop laughing when I read this kind of
corporate media babble. You gotta hand it to the
corporate media though, they certainly work vigilantly
at keeping the sheep as brain washed as possible. When
are the sheeple in this country going to wake up and
realize we don't have two different political parties
anymore. We've become a complete plutocracy. Hell,
there's not even a U.S. anymore. We're just a bunch of
corporate zombies, and we're to ignorant to even
realize it. Talk about mass delusion! Rick.]  



GOP's current position mirrors Democrats' spot in 1993

Source >
http://news.yahoo.com/s/krwashbureau/20050519/ts_krwashbureau/_bc_congress_politics_wa

By Steven Thomma, Knight Ridder Newspapers Thu May 19,
5:26 PM ET

WASHINGTON - Republicans are starting to find
themselves in the same kind of political environment
that Democrats faced in the summer of 1993 - the year
before the Democrats lost control of both houses of
Congress for the first time in 40 years.
ADVERTISEMENT

Reverse the party labels and the circumstances are
strikingly similar.

Now, as then with the other party, Republicans' ethics
are under assault. Their opposition denounces their
vicelike control as "arrogant." Their ambitious agenda
risks overreach and public backlash. Their popularity
is sinking. A unified opposition party is holding off
until closer to the next election before offering its
own agenda - thus withholding any good target for
counterattack.

There's one major difference. Both parties have
redrawn House of Representatives district boundaries
to make their members safer. That makes it much more
difficult than in 1994 to sweep the ruling party out
of power in a single wave of voter anger. Also,
Republicans have more than a year to improve their
standing, plenty of time in politics.

Still, Republicans have cause for concern, and
Democrats for optimism.

"The mood we have now is not the mood we had then, but
it is developing in that direction," said Stuart
Rothenberg, an independent political analyst and the
publisher of the Rothenberg Political Report.
"Possible gridlock on Capitol Hill. Questions about
ethics or abuse of power. Fatigue about incumbent
president. All that could lead to an anti-politics,
anti-Washington mood not favorable to the incumbent
party."

Many Americans already are in a down-on-Washington
mood. Three polls show support for Congress dropping,
with some measures rivaling lows of 1993-94.

An NBC-Wall Street Journal survey last week showed 33
percent public approval of how Congress is doing its
job, while 51 percent disapproved. That was near the
32 percent approval-56 percent disapproval rating of
May 1994, six months before Democrats lost control of
Congress.

Perhaps more telling is the weak support that
Americans give their own members of Congress. A recent
survey by the Pew Research Center found that only 49
percent of Americans approved of their own
representatives, while 23 percent disapproved. That's
comparable with 1993.

"A 49 percent approval rating is not exactly a
stunning endorsement for members of Congress, who
typically have extraordinarily high re-election
rates," said Andy Kohut, the director of the
nonpartisan Pew center.

Neither party is scoring well with the public, but
Republicans fare worse, largely because they're in
charge. What's behind this? Violence in
Iraq, high gas prices, economic anxiety.
President Bush's approval ratings also are near
all-time lows, but Republicans in Congress have extra
burdens.

First is the ethics cloud hanging over House Majority
Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas. He's accused of taking
foreign trips financed by lobbyists or foreign
interests, and last year he was rebuked three times
for other ethics violations.

House Democrats are using DeLay's troubles to bludgeon
his party, which is ironic given his nickname: the
Hammer. Democrats are raising money for their "Hammer
the Hammer Fund," $82,000 so far. They charge that
DeLay's actions aren't isolated, but rather
illustrative of a corrupt party. They're trying hard
to find ethically clean candidates to challenge
Republican incumbents.

While DeLay's everyone-does-it defense has led to
revelations that other members, including Democrats,
have taken lobbyist-financed trips, even that worries
some Republicans, who fear it could bring the entire
House under a cloud, much as the 1991 House bank
scandal tarred members for years.

Also, Republicans are sharply limiting the Democrats'
role in decision-making. Last week they began moving
to strip Senate Democrats of their ability to block
judicial nominees. Earlier, they excluded Democrats
from House-Senate negotiations on an energy bill and
all but two Democrats from bargaining over a major
Medicare overhaul. Such sessions traditionally have
been bipartisan.

"Abuse of power," said a group of Democrats protesting
outside the Senate last week. "Put an end to DeLay's
House of Scandal," said a House Democratic Web site.

Compare those slogans with Republican vows in 1994 "to
restore accountability to Congress" and "end its cycle
of scandal and disgrace."

Today's Republican agenda also adds risks.

Bush's proposal to overhaul
Social Security has cost his party and him support,
much as
President Clinton's plan to overhaul health care did
in 1993-94. The Republican attempt to intercede in the
case of
Terri Schiavo, a brain-damaged Florida woman whose
husband wanted to remove her life support, proved
popular with the party's base but prompted a broader
backlash, much as Democratic efforts to let gays serve
openly in the military did in 1993.

Finally, Democrats refuse to lay out an alternative
agenda until they get closer to the 2006 elections.
Republicans in 1994 didn't unveil their "Contract With
America" until September, late enough to avoid months
of counterattacks from Democrats but early enough to
capture voters' attention.

"We want them to focus on the Republicans now," said
Mike Erlandson, a congressional aide and the chairman
of Minnesota's Democratic Party.

DeLay said Republicans had little to worry about.

"The American people have no idea what we're passing.
And we have plenty of time to show them what we're
passing," he said. "Polls mean nothing."

He added that the Democrats' strategy will fail: "They
have no agenda, they have no ideas, they have no
leadership. If that's how they think they're going to
take back the majority, they're going to be sadly
disappointed the day after the election in 2006."

For more on the Pew poll, go to www.people-press.org.

For the Republican perspective, go to
www.majorityleader.gov or www.nrcc.org.

For the Democratic perspective, www.dccc.org. 



                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Ever feel sad or cry for no reason at all?
Depression. Narrated by Kate Hudson.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/LLQ_sC/esnJAA/E2hLAA/08NolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

contact owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

no flaming arguing or denigration of others allowed
contact owner with complaints regarding posting/list 
or anything else.  Thank you.
please share/comment/inform and mostly enjoy this list

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/quick_vegetarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to