Hi Andreas, [Andreas Gruenbacher] > currently the refresh command writes directly into the existing patch > file instead of creating a new file, which makes a difference when > the patch is a symlink or hardlink. I think it makes more sense to > create a new object instead, so that a refresh will work nicely with > hardlinked patches. Are there any reasons not to change that?
Sounds sane to me, no objection - although I'd like to be told about scenarii where hardlinked patch files are used. > Proposed patch attached. Not exactly related, but why do we bother handling .tgz files? I don't quite see how a patch could be a .tgz file. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
