On Saturday 02 July 2005 18:59, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > [Andreas Gruenbacher] > > > currently the refresh command writes directly into the existing patch > > file instead of creating a new file, which makes a difference when > > the patch is a symlink or hardlink. I think it makes more sense to > > create a new object instead, so that a refresh will work nicely with > > hardlinked patches. Are there any reasons not to change that? > > Sounds sane to me, no objection - although I'd like to be told about > scenarii where hardlinked patch files are used.
Well, they were simply written to up to now. With the patch, a new patch is created instead. > > Proposed patch attached. > > Not exactly related, but why do we bother handling .tgz files? I don't > quite see how a patch could be a .tgz file. Yes, that can go as well. -- Andreas. _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
