Dustin J. Mitchell writes: > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:10 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A check could be done at the end of the edit command to see if a refresh > > is needed or an attempt to refresh even if it is unneeded (that is > > what is done optionally in the patch). I think this is safe to do.
Now I see it is "safe" only for very specific cases. > I understand that this is optional, but I think that it does not fit > with most users' workflows. A "quilt refresh" is, in my workflow, > similar to "git commit" -- only done when I've made what I believe to > be a coherent set of changes. Mine is/was different: I make timestamped/tagged tarballs of the patches directory for this. But, it may be more intuitive to think refresh == commit == checkin. Thanks, -- solofo _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
