Andreas Gruenbacher writes: > > In which case is a "quilt refresh" *not* desirable after a "quilt edit"? > > This really depends on your workflow. For example, I often complete a set of > changes across a set of files, check with" quilt diff -z" whether all the > changes are correct, and only then refresh the current patch (or put the > changes into a new patch with "quilt refresh -z").
Thanks for the tips! I didn't know about "-z". My quilt (0.46) even doesn't seem to have it for refresh. > > Anything wrong with making an option to "edit" that does the refresh? > > I'm not entirely convinced that people actually use quilt this way (except > in > very rare cases). What also irritates me is that changes to all files a > patch > contains will end up in the patch, not only the changes from the edit > command. I see. -- solofo _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
