On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 03:57:53PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > I still believe we want this shell-based backup-script, no matter how > high the performance penalty is. quilt was written in bash after all, > which pretty much implies that we do no care about performance;
Um, no, I would disagree. I deal with a tree that is almost always over 300 patches, and push and pop all of them many, many, times a day. Making 'quilt pop' 3 times slower would drive me crazy, I already feel it's a bit too slow in places... thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list Quilt-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
