On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:50:23AM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote: > * Tim Bird <[email protected]>: > > Jean Delvare wrote: > > > I never tried these myself, as I am happy with quilt, but wouldn't > > > stgit or guilt be suitable for your task? If so, they may be faster > > > than quilt (or not, I just don't know.) > > > > Thanks for the pointers. I had heard of people using "stacked git", > > but thought it was a git methodology, not actual software. I've > > never heard of guilt before, but it looks interesting. > > > > For our large trees, we manage a series of patches with quilt, all > > checked in to a git tree alongside the source. It looks > > like other people are doing the same thing, albeit with different > > tools. > > gregkh has complained about the speed (or lack thereof) when > using StGit for large patchsets. It's something I've noticed > myself when, say, importing the relatively small mmotm patch > queue (which only numbers in the hundreds, not thousands) into an > stg tree.
Yes, the last time I tried StGit, it was very slow. But that might be fixed now, I haven't tried it out. Same goes for topgit, I haven't tried that in a long time either. greg k-h _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
