On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 07:35:34PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > Hello, > > thanks for this patch. > > I have one question, out of curiosity. Why do you set SED to @SED@ and > then call $SET. Wouldn't it be more efficient to directly call @SED@ ?
I did it to save one byte each time it's used in the source... j/k ;-) I did it because I thought that was the preferred idiom based on how PATCH is substituted in bin/patch-wrapper.in. I don't mind changing it if you prefer (and see my forthcoming reply to Andreas). _______________________________________________ Quilt-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/quilt-dev
