On Mar 9, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On 3/9/2006 10:19 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On 3/8/2006 8:59 PM, David Binger wrote:
There isn't any difference between QP and Quixote with respect
to compatibility. The scgi server used by both uses passfd, which
does not run on Windows.
But the protocol doesn't require *forking*, right? It's an
implementation detail. Writing a less-efficient but stable-and-
semantically-equivalent SCGI implementation for win32 shouldn't be
a total show-stopper, just a fun weekend challenge for someone. :-).
Oops, replace 'forking' with 'passfd'. Still true, n'est-ce pas?
Right. Any volunteers?
_______________________________________________
Quixote-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users
