On 3/9/06, David Binger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 9, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote: > > > On 3/9/2006 10:19 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote: > > > >> On 3/8/2006 8:59 PM, David Binger wrote: > >> > >>> There isn't any difference between QP and Quixote with respect > >>> to compatibility. The scgi server used by both uses passfd, which > >>> does not run on Windows. > >> > >> But the protocol doesn't require *forking*, right? It's an > >> implementation detail. Writing a less-efficient but stable-and- > >> semantically-equivalent SCGI implementation for win32 shouldn't be > >> a total show-stopper, just a fun weekend challenge for someone. :-). > > > > > > Oops, replace 'forking' with 'passfd'. Still true, n'est-ce pas? > > > Right. Any volunteers?
This would be a synchronious server then or a multithreaded server? -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ([EMAIL PROTECTED] address is semi-reliable) -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ([EMAIL PROTECTED] address is semi-reliable) _______________________________________________ Quixote-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users
