Not sure I agree. It would be nice for the rest of us to be aware of errors that come up as well as they might affect our analysis.
--- In [email protected], "Howard R. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Keith, > > An interesting thought but I would rather see Quotes Plus return to the > old method they once used to handle data errors. At one time Quotes > Plus had a separate E-Mail address to which users were suppose to send > questions about data and report data errors. The E-Mail address was > some thing similar to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions about data of > general interest could still be discussed in this group but problems > with the data for one issue should be sent directly to Quotes Plus. > > Howard > > Keith McCombs wrote: > > > > I was wondering if things might run a little smoother for both QP staff > > and us users if there were more than one Yahoo QP forum. Perhaps adding > > the following would help: > > 1. quotes-plus-data: to report suspicious or missing data > > 2. quotes-plus-dividends: to report new/missing mutual fund dividends > > (perhaps users in the know might even report the actual distributions). > > 3. quotes-plus-suggestions: obvious > > > > Then the present quotes-plus could be mostly for user questions and > > help, staff announcements, etc. > > -- Keith > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > >
