Lionel,

At present it seems like all data error questions are sent to this news 
group and Gary answers all data error questions.  Hence the question is, 
would Gary need to spend a significant additional amount of time to 
answer data error questions if they were sent directly to Quotes Plus 
instead of to this news group?

Howard

Lionel Issen wrote:
>
> This may not work since QP no longer has much or any support staff.
>
> Lionel
>
> _____
>
> From: [email protected] 
> <mailto:quotes-plus%40yahoogroups.com> 
> [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:quotes-plus%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> Behalf Of Howard R. Hansen
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 12:11 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:quotes-plus%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [quotes-plus] Possible friction reducer.
>
> Keith,
>
> An interesting thought but I would rather see Quotes Plus return to the
> old method they once used to handle data errors. At one time Quotes
> Plus had a separate E-Mail address to which users were suppose to send
> questions about data and report data errors. The E-Mail address was
> some thing similar to [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:data%40QuotesPlus.com> com.
> Questions about data of
> general interest could still be discussed in this group but problems
> with the data for one issue should be sent directly to Quotes Plus.
>
> Howard
>
> Keith McCombs wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering if things might run a little smoother for both QP staff
> > and us users if there were more than one Yahoo QP forum. Perhaps adding
> > the following would help:
> > 1. quotes-plus-data: to report suspicious or missing data
> > 2. quotes-plus-dividends: to report new/missing mutual fund dividends
> > (perhaps users in the know might even report the actual distributions).
> > 3. quotes-plus-suggestions: obvious
> >
> > Then the present quotes-plus could be mostly for user questions and
> > help, staff announcements, etc.
> > -- Keith
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  

Reply via email to